Saturday, April 13, 2019

A Conventional Farmer's View of Organic Farming

It occurred to me recently that many of my readers might think I have an ax to grind against the organic sector.  And why not?  I've never given you any reason to believe that I feel anything other than disgust towards everything organic.  However, the reality is that I am extremely grateful that we have organic farmers.  Today, I want to clarify my stance towards the organic sector of agriculture.

I love to hear about the production methods used by organic farmers!  Dedicated readers (and Facebook followers) will have heard me talk about the farmer's toolbox before.  Farmers need to have a multitude of tools on hand to deal with the various challenges we face.  We need to have ways to deal with sick animals, pest problems, poor soil fertility and a host of other challenges.  Depending on the challenge, our tools to solve the problem generally fall into one of the following categories: chemical, mechanical, preventative, biological, or cultural.

To very quickly explain that, let's say that a farmer has a problem with some aggressive weeds in one of his fields.  He could control the weeds using chemical pesticides.  Or, he could till the soil, thus uprooting the plants, which is an example of mechanical control.  He might also prevent the problem in the first place by buying crop seed with a guaranteed minimum number of weed seeds in it (no crop seed is 100% clean).  He could use a biological method of control by finding and introducing a natural predator or pest to the plant.  Finally, the farmer might use cultural control by understanding how the weed plant grows and timing cropping activities to disrupt the weed's growth (for example, he might plant a perennial crop in a field plagued by annual weeds).  Each of these methods of controlling the weeds is a tool in the farmer's toolbox.

Organic farmers face the same challenges, but have fewer tools in their toolbox, mainly because they cannot rely on chemical controls to the same degree that conventional farmers can.  In recent decades, conventional farmers have relied heavily on chemical solutions to our problems, and because of that, we've been able to develop some really great tools in that category.  Unfortunately, we have, at times, relied on these tools too heavily, and that has caused us problems, as well.  Additionally, our strong dependence on synthetic chemicals means that we have forgotten how to use some of our other tools to the greatest effect.  That's where organic production comes in to save the day!

Organic producers have been searching for non-chemical solutions to our common challenges for just as many decades as conventional farmers have been working on chemical controls.  Because of that, organic producers are sometimes miles ahead of the rest of us in their effective use of such tools as biological controls and polyculture cropping systems.

Having grown up on a conventional farm, I barely know enough to even continue typing right now, but I've been slowly learning a little about these non-chemical solutions to common problems, and I am downright intrigued.  I have gotten a little bit nerdy in recent months thinking about how to incorporate such tools as biological agents, intensive grazing, and cover crops into my own farm.  It's mind boggling to think of all of the things I don't yet know!

Now, I'm not about to become an organic farmer, mind you.  I think that many of the synthetic tools we've been using have an important role in providing solutions, so long as they are not the only tool used.  However, I've been thinking that it's high time we moved just a few steps back from our synthetic chemicals and took a closer look at what the organic producers are doing.  Why not incorporate some more of those mechanical, biological, cultural, and preventative controls back into our farms, so that our approach to building solutions is more balanced than what is has been?

Why not put resources into research for polyculture crops, whether that means growing two cash crops simultaneously in a field, or planting one cash crop with cover crops that can be used for fall grazing, or any number of different scenarios?  Maybe if we could do this successfully, we could cut down on pest and disease pressure in our crops.  Maybe we could grow more on less land and then have some left over for livestock to graze after harvest!  And all without synthetic fertilizer or pesticides.

Why not put more resources towards finding biological agents to control pests.  We've got thistle stem-gall flies and stem-mining weevils to control Canada Thistle.  I recently read about beetles that eat weed seeds, such as volunteer canola.  And people have know for ages about the benefits of having ladybugs around!  Why not figure out how to cultivate these beneficial organisms?  Think of the totally cool science jobs that would become available if we put more resources into this type of research.  (Yes, there are totally cool science jobs in making chemical tools, too, but why can't we have more of both?)
A Canada Thistle Stem-Gall Fly. 
I bought some of these in 2018 to control some patches of Canada Thistle in my pasture.  Unfortunately, the thistles had been largely knocked out by a severe hailstorm the year before, so I found very few thistles on which to place my flies. 
And while we're at it, why not look a little more closely at some of the weirder things organic farmers have been doing?  Have you heard about using diatomaceous earth to control lice or adding garlic to cattle minerals to repel flies?  Why not see if that really works?  I think it would be easier to sprinkle a bit of powdery stuff on the back of the cattle than to have to squeeze that stiff applicator gun a hundred times to get the liquid insecticides on the cattle.  And feeding mineral with garlic in it really doesn't increase the cost much (yes, I definitely tried that last summer, but we kind of missed the heavy fly season window with it, so I can't actually say how well it worked).

And what about using livestock for weed control!  And I'm not just talking about training the animals to eat the weeds.  I'm talking about mob grazing and using strategy to get the herd to absolutely decimate that patch of weeds in a short amount of time, taking a field full of weeds and turning it into beautiful pasture in just a few years just by grazing it properly! 

Why aren't we conventional farmers doing these things that really work?!  Why aren't we looking for even more things that could work?!  The organic guys have such a huge head start in these areas and we're barely even paying attention to the amazing tools they've discovered!

By now you must be asking, "well then, if you're so excited about some of the options and advancements that have come out of the organic sector, why do you so often write against organic?"  I'm glad you asked.  My problem with the organic sector has next to nothing to do with the production of organic food and everything to do with how that food is marketed.

Organic has, for many years, been marketed as the only truly safe food in town.  It is supposed to be more nutritious and cleaner than its conventionally farmed counterparts, as well as being pesticide-, hormone-, GMO-, steroid-, antibiotic-,  whatever-else-"free." 

Oh, the lies that have been told!

I won't argue against specifics, as you can check out my past blog posts and videos to learn more about why you don't need to worry about GMO food, the use of artificial hormones (including steroids), the use of antibiotics, or the use of pesticides.  All I'm going to say is that, while being restricted in what can be used, organic farmers can use some of the tools that conventional farmers use.  For example, if an animal gets sick, an organic farmer can treat that animal with antibiotics, and still have the food that comes from that animal be certified organic.  There's just longer withdrawal times.  Also, organic farmers can and do use chemical pesticides.  These pesticides are ones that are derived from natural sources, rather than synthetic ones, but that does not mean they are any less toxic.

Knowing all of this, I can't help but become incredibly frustrated by the marketing tactics of companies selling organic food when they try to demonize conventionally grown crops, which I know to be safe for consumption.  And that is why I write so vehemently in defense of safe conventional methods and against organic marketing, even though I immensely enjoy hearing about the latest organic production methods.

Thursday, April 11, 2019

My Response to the Dirty Dozen

I had an interesting encounter on social media today. As always, I was relaxing for a while during my lunch break between my town job and my farm work and as I often do, I was casually scrolling through Facebook. A post from a radio station I follow suddenly caught my eye, and I stared at the post in disbelief. The post shared 2019's Dirty Dozen list and the recipe for a produce wash. After taking a moment to calm myself, I clicked into the comments and left my response, as you can see in the picture below.
This next picture is the reply I received.
Overall, a fairly civil conversation. Unfortunately, I'm not sure the station host quite understood why I have a problem with her sharing this misinformation with all of the station's followers.

In case you don't know, every year the Environmental Working Group (EWG) puts out the "Dirty Dozen" list, along with a "Clean Fifteen" list. These list the twelve fruits and vegetables with the highest levels of pesticide residue, and the fifteen fruits and veggies with the lowest levels, according to research done by the EWG. The EWG encourages people to buy the organic versions of the Dirty Dozen. Actually, they encourage people to buy the organic version of all produce. They do recognize, however, that organic produce is expensive, so for those who are afraid to buy any produce now, they recommend buying organic versions of the "dirtiest" fruits and veggies, while sticking to the "cleanest" ones if you must buy conventionally raised produce.

I have so many issues with the EWG and it's Dirty Dozen/Clean Fifteen Lists, but I'll try to stick to just the ones that really get me seething mad. This is not just a rant, mind you. I'm writing this blog post for a purpose; I want you, my readers, to know what this list is really about and why you don't need to shop in fear.

Issue 1: The Information is Misleading and the Science is Shoddy.
Evidence that the EWG's scientific findings are suspect
Issue 2: The EWG is funded mainly by organic groups and businesses. This creates bias.
Funding information straight from the EWG's "About Us" section of their website

Issue 3: The misleading information is having real and negative effects on buying habits.
A Screenshot from the EWG's Dirty Dozen FAQ Page

A scholarly article on the detrimental effect that lists such as the "Dirty Dozen" have on the diets of low-income consumers

Issue 4: The lists ignore Organic Pesticides. Again, this shows bias.
A few of the approved organic pesticides that producers can and do use

Want to know more? Ask a farmer - both organic and conventional farmers should be able to tell you why lists like the "Dirty Dozen" hurt us all. We don't need fear to sell our food.